Switch to ADA Accessible Theme
Close Menu
Take a deep breath. Call NOW for help!
  • 407-775-9052
  • 200 East Robinson Street, Suite 1140
    Orlando, FL 32801

  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • AVVO
Florida Drug Defense Attorney > Blog > Drug Crime Defense > It’s Not Mine: What Florida Law Really Says When the Drugs Belonged to Someone Else

It’s Not Mine: What Florida Law Really Says When the Drugs Belonged to Someone Else

__Possession

Picture a scenario that plays out constantly on I-4 and around downtown Orlando. Police pull over a car with four people in it. Somewhere in the console, or under a seat, or in a backpack in the trunk, they find drugs. Nobody claims them. Everybody has a story. And yet, in a lot of these situations, more than one person walks away with a criminal charge, even though only one person could possibly have put the drugs there in the first place.

This surprises people every time. The instinct is that criminal responsibility should track ownership, that if the pills or the powder or the bag of weed belonged to your cousin, your roommate, or a stranger you just met, you shouldn’t be the one facing a felony. Florida law does not work quite that cleanly, and understanding why matters if you ever find yourself in this position.

Ownership and Possession Are Two Different Legal Ideas

Under Florida law, prosecutors do not have to prove that a defendant owned the drugs in question. Section 893.13(6), Florida Statutes, makes it illegal to be in “actual or constructive possession” of a controlled substance, and constructive possession is the concept that trips people up. It generally means the substance was found in a place the person had control over, or that the person had the ability to exercise dominion over it, even without physically holding it. So if drugs turn up in a car’s glove compartment, and more than one person had access to that glove compartment, prosecutors may argue that everyone with access had constructive possession, regardless of whose stash it actually was.

Knowledge Still Has to Come Into the Picture Somewhere

There is a related wrinkle worth knowing about. Section 893.101, Florida Statutes, states that knowledge of a substance’s illegal nature is not technically an element the state must prove, but lack of that knowledge can be raised as an affirmative defense. In practice, this means that simply being near drugs someone else brought into a shared space does not automatically end the conversation. Whether a person knew the substance was there, and whether they had any real control over it, are often the exact questions that determine how a case unfolds. This is not a simple bright line, and how it plays out depends heavily on the specific facts, which is exactly why generic explanations can only go so far.

Why This Distinction Matters More in Shared Spaces

Cars, apartments, hotel rooms, even backpacks passed between friends at a festival: these are the settings where “it wasn’t mine” gets tested the most. Proximity alone is not supposed to be enough under Florida law, but proving that in court is a different matter than reading it on a page. The gap between the legal standard and how an arrest actually happens is often where these cases get decided.

If you were arrested for drug possession in the Orlando area over drugs you say belonged to someone else, this distinction between ownership and possession is worth taking seriously, and it is the kind of issue Florida drug possession attorneys deal with regularly. We encourage you to reach out to FL Drug Defense Group to talk through what happened in your case and what your options look like from here.

Source:

flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2024/893.13

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn